Netherlands 21 November 1996 District Court Rotterdam (Biesbrouck v. Huizer Export)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961121n1.html]
DATE OF DECISIONS:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: 95-3590
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Unavailable
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Belgium (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: Netherlands (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: Flowers (bush daisies)
APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issues:
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:
39A [Requirement to notify seller of lack of conformity: buyer must notify seller within reasonable time];
49B [Buyer's loss of right to declare avoidance after delivery: timeliness of notice of avoidance];
82A1 [Buyer's inability to return good in same condition: loss of right to avoid contract]
Descriptors:
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
English: Unilex database <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=318&step=Abstract>
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Dutch): Nederlands International Privaatrecht (NIPR) 1997 No. 223 [275-276]; Unilex database [excerpt] <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=318&step=FullText>
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
English: CISG-AC advisory opinion on Examination of the Goods and Notice of Non-Conformity [7 June 2004] (this case and related cases cited in addendum to opinion); [2004] S.A. Kruisinga, (Non-)conformity in the 1980 UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: a uniform concept?, Intersentia at 79, 95, 172, 181; [2005] Schlechtriem & Schwenzer ed., Commentary on UN Convention on International Sale of Goods, 2d (English) ed., Oxford University Press, Art. 82 para. 9
Go to Case Table of Contents