Netherlands 7 December 1994 District Court Amsterdam (Hans Hagemann v. Bell Rain Regenkleding Industries)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941207n1.html]
Primary source(s) for case presentation: F. De Ly; Michael R. Will
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: H 92.3614
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Unavailable
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Germany (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: Netherlands (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: Textiles
APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue: Article
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code
numbers:
EDITORS: Franco Ferrari and Albert H. Kritzer
CISG issues ruled upon:
Applicability. Contract between a seller from Germany and a buyer from the
Netherlands was concluded at a
time when the CISG was in effect in Germany but not in the Netherlands.
German law was applied. This was
held to be the CISG pursuant to Article 1(1)(b).
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Dutch): Nederlands Internationaal
Privaatrecht (NIPR) 1995 No. 232 [196-197]
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
English: Ferrari, Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrechts (NIPR) 13
(1995) 317 [328]Classification of issues present
Editorial remarks
Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
Pace Law School Institute of International
Commercial Law - Last updated February 7, 2002