European Court of Justice 29 June 1994 (Custom Made Commercial v. Stawa Metallbau)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940629eu.html]
Primary source(s) for case presentation: Case text
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: C-288/92
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Prior proceedings: BGH [Germany (Supreme Court)] 26 March 1992
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Germany (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: United Kingdom (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: Windows and doors
Case abstract EUROPEAN UNION: European Court of Justice 29 June 1994 Case law on UNCITRAL texts (CLOUT) abstract no. 298 Reproduced with permission from UNCITRAL The judgement was issued in response to a question brought before the European Court of Justice by
the German Bundesgerichtshof according to art. 177 of the European Economic Community Treaty. With regard to the interpretation of the European Communities Convention on Jurisdiction and the
Enforcement of Judgements in Civil and Commercial Matters, the Bundesgerichtshof asked whether the
place of performance under its article 5(1) must be determined on the basis of substantive law
provisions governing the obligation at issue, according to the rules of conflict of the jurisdiction in
which the action was brought, even if those rules indicate that a unified substantive law, such as the
1964 Hague Convention relating to the Uniform Law on the International Sale of Goods, must apply to
the contract. The European Court of Justice affirmed the question and identified the place of performance of the
obligation to pay as being the seller's place of business. Although the decision itself dealt with the Hague Uniform Law on the International Sale of Goods, the
same rationale applies to CISG. According to the reasoning of this decision, article 57 CISG should
apply to determine the place of performance in the event that CISG is to govern a contract.
APPLICATION OF CISG: ULIS proceeding, but results comparable to
those achievable under CISG
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue: Article
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code
numbers:
Descriptors:
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Published in all official languages of the European Communities: [1994] Report of Cases Before the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance
English: [1993] International Litigation Procedure 490-500
French: [1994] Revue critique de droit international privé 692-698; [1995] Revue trimestrlle de droit européen 83-87
German: 1994 European Court Reports (ECR) I- 2913-2960; Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft (RIW) 1994, 676-678, 876-877; Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 1995, 183-184; RJDA 1994, 846-847; Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 1995, 31-33, 692-698; Juristen-Zeitung (JZ) 1995, 244-245
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
English: Bernstein, 11 Tulane European & Civil Law Forum (1996) 31 [45-47]; Vlas, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 1994, 342-344; Karollus, Cornell Review of the CISG (1995) 51 [75-76]; Curran, 15 Journal of Law and Commerce (1995) 175-199 [195-196] [English summary of comments by Witz cited below]; Bernstein & Lookofsky, Understanding the CISG in Europe, 2d ed., Kluwer (2003) §: 2-11 n.178; [2004] S.A. Kruisinga, (Non-)conformity in the 1980 UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: a uniform concept?, Intersentia at 55; [2005] Schlechtriem & Schwenzer ed., Commentary on UN Convention on International Sale of Goods, 2d (English) ed., Oxford University Press, Art. 31 para. 89 Art. 57 para. 11a
French: Witz, Les premiéres applications jurisprudentielles
du droit uniforme de la cente internationales (L.G.D.J. Paris 1995) 80-83; Gaudemet-Tallon, Revue critique de droit international
privé (1994) 698-707; Tichadou, Revue
trimestrielle de droit européen (RTDEur) 31 (1995) 87-103; A.H.
[Huet], Journal du Droit International (1995) 461-465; Tagaras, Cahiers de
Droit Européen (1995), 222-226; von Overbrook, Liber amicorum Droz (1996) 287-298 [289]
German: Geimer, Juristen-Zeitung (JZ) 1995, 245-246; Jayme, Praxis des
internationalen Privat- und
Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 1995, 13-14; Jayme/Kohler, Praxis des
internationalen Privat- und
Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 1994, 405 [410-411]; Kadner, [1997] Juristische Ausbildung (Jura) 240-248; Karollus,
[österreichisches] Recht der Wirtschaft
(öRdW)
1994, 387-388; Koch, Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft (RIW) 1996, 379-382; Kohler, Zeitschrift für Europäisches
Privatrecht (ZEuP) 1995, 497-499; Rainer, Wirtschaftsrechtliche Beratung (WB) 1995,
438-439; Schack, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (ZEuP) 1995, 659-668; Schlechtriem,
Entscheidungen zum Wirtschaftsrecht (EWiR) Art. 5 EuGVÜ 1/95, 55-56; Volken, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für
Internationales und Europäisches Recht (SZIER) / Revue suisse de droit
international et de droit européen (1995), 295-298
Spanish: A.B. [Borràs Rodriguez], Revista Juridica de
Catalunya (1995), 276-278
Classification of issues present
Editorial remarks
Citations to other abstracts, case texts and commentaries
CITATIONS TO OTHER ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated August 9, 2005
Comments/Contributions
Go to Database Directory || Go to CISG Table of Contents
|| Go to Case Search Form || Go to Bibliography