Netherlands 29 April 1993 District Court Arnhem (Gröticke v. Neptunus Shipyard)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930429n1.html]
Primary source(s) for case presentation: F. De Ly; Michael R. Will; Unilex abstract
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: 92/1535
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Unavailable
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Netherlands (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: Germany (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: Sailing-yacht
APPLICATION OF CISG: No
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue: Article
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code
numbers:
EDITORS: Franco Ferrari and Albert H. Kritzer
CISG issues ruled upon:
Applicability. This case involves a contract between seller (Netherlands)
and buyer (Germany) concluded on 6 December 1988 --
a date prior to the time the CISG entered into effect
in either country. Citing Articles 1(1)
and 100, the court termed the CISG inapplicable.
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
English: Unilex database <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=73&step=Abstract>
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Dutch): Nederlands Internationaal
Privaatrecht (NIPR) 1993 No. 448
[692-693]; Unilex database [excerpt] <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=73&step=FullText>
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
English: Ferrari, International Legal Forum (4/1998) 138-255 [207 n.619 (exclusions from the CISG)]
Dutch: Boele-Woelki, Ars Aequi 43 (1994) 2460-2461 Classification of issues present
Editorial remarks
Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION