Netherlands 7 May 1992 District Court Arnhem (Dralle-Fruchthandel v. H.C. Van Bligederveen Fruit Ingen)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920507n1.html]
Primary source(s) for case presentation: F. De Ly; Michael R. Will; Unilex abstract
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: 1991/252
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Unavailable
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Germany (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: Netherlands (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: Apples
APPLICATION OF CISG: No
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue: Article
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code
numbers:
Descriptors:
EDITORS: Franco Ferrari and Albert H. Kritzer
CISG issues ruled upon:
Applicability. This case involves a contract between a seller (Germany) and
a buyer (Netherlands) concluded
prior to the date the CISG entered into force in either country.
Citing Article 100, the court held the CISG
inapplicable.
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
English: Unilex database <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=98&step=Abstract>
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Dutch): Nederlands Internationaal
Privaatrecht (NIPR) 1992 No. 390
[659-660]; Unilex database [excerpt] <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=98&step=FullText> Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
UnavailableClassification of issues present
Editorial remarks
Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION