Netherlands 20 January 2000 District Court Rotterdam (Hars & Hagebaeuer BV v. Amuyen SA)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000120n1.html]
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: HAZA 99-325
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Unavailable
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Argentina (defendant)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: Netherlands (plaintiff)
GOODS INVOLVED: Cherries
APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes [Article 1(1)(a)]
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue:
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:
35A [Conformity of goods: quality, quantity and description required by contract];
38A [Buyer’s obligation for examining goods: time for examining goods];
39A2 [Requirement to notify seller of lack of conformity: buyer must notify seller within reasonable time]
Descriptors:
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
English: Unilex database <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=843&step=Abstract>
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Dutch): Nederlands International Privaatrecht (2000) n. 121 [excerpt]; Unilex database <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=843&step=FullText> [excerpt]
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
English: CISG-AC advisory opinion on Examination of the Goods and Notice of Non-Conformity [7 June 2004] (this case and related cases cited in addendum to opinion); [2004] S.A. Kruisinga, (Non-)conformity in the 1980 UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: a uniform concept?, Intersentia at 93, 173, 180, 181
Go to Case Table of Contents
Pace Law School
Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated November 10, 2004