THE STATES PARTIES TO THIS CONVENTION,
BEARING IN MIND the broad objectives in the resolutions adopted by the sixth special session of the General Assembly of the United Nations on the establishment of a New International Economic Order,
CONSIDERING that the development of international trade on the basis of equality and mutual benefit is an important element in promoting friendly relations among States,
BEING OF THE OPINION that the adoption of uniform rules which govern contracts for the international sale of goods and take into account the different social, economic and legal systems would contribute to the removal of legal barriers in international trade and promote the development of international trade,
HAVE DECREED as follows:
Legislative history || Case Law || Scholarly writings || Links to related articles || Words and phrases || CISG (full-text)
Legislative history
Case law
10 May 2002 United States District Court [Southern Dist. NY] Geneva Pharmaceuticals Tech. Corp. v. Barr Labs. Inc., 201 F.Supp.2d 236 at 285
"The intent of the contracting parties to the CISG can be discerned from the
introductory text, which states that 'the adoption of uniform rules which govern
contracts for the international sale of goods and take into account the different social,
economic and legal systems would contribute to the removal of legal barriers in
international trade and promote the development of international trade.' 15 U.S.C.App.
at 53. The CISG further recognizes the importance of 'equality and mutual benefit.' Id.
These objectives are reiterated in the President's Letter of Transmittal of the CISG to
the Senate as well as the Secretary of State's Letter of Submittal of the CISG to the
President. Id. at 70-72. The then-Secretary of State, George P. Schultz, noted:
'Sales transactions that cross international boundaries are subject to legal
uncertainty - doubt as to which legal system will apply and the difficulty of coping with
unfamiliar foreign law. The sales contract may specify which law will apply, but our
sellers and buyers cannot expect that foreign trading partners will always agree on the
applicability of United States law. … The Convention's approach provides an effective
solution for this difficult problem. When a contract for an international sale of goods
does not make clear which rule of law applies, the Convention provides uniform rules
to govern the questions that arise in making and performance of the Contract.' Id. at 71.
"This court concurs that 'the expressly stated goal of developing uniform international
contract law to promote international trade indicates the intent of the parties to the
treaty to have the treaty pre-empt state law causes of action.' Asante Tech., Inc. v.
PMC-Sierra, Inc., 164 F.Supp.2d 1142, 1151 (N.D.Cal. 2001)."
Links to related articles Click here for the full text of Enderlein & Maskow's remarks on the Preamble.
Scholarly writings on the Preamble
Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law
- Last updated August 9, 2002
Comments/Contributions
Go to Database Directory ||
Go to Table of Contents to Annotated Text of CISG