(2) The seller is not entitled to rely on the provisions of the preceding
paragraph if he knew of
the right or claim of the third party and the nature of it.
Scholarly writings on this article
- Selected monographs and anthologies (English language)
- Selected law journal articles and other commentaries
Links to related articles
Go also to Annotated Text of Article 39 [Notice of lack of conformity] (Article 43(1) is the counterpart of Article 39(1)); and go to Annotated Text of Article 40 [Seller's knowledge of non-conformity] (Article (43(2) matches it).
Words, phrases and concepts
- "notice". Mr. Klingsporn [W. Germany], introducing [the text that became Article 43(2)], said that the buyer lost the benefit of articles [41 and 42] if he did not give notice to the seller specifying the nature of the claim of the third party within a reasonable time. . . . Those considerations were not valid if the seller was aware of the existence of the right or claim of the third party concerned. In that case, it would be unfair to deprive the buyer of his remedy on grounds of non-notification within a reasonable time. Comparison might be made with the situation covered by articles [38 and 39] if the lack of conformity related to facts of which he knew or could not have been unaware." OR 350, paras. 78-80 [OR = Official Records of the United Nations Conference on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Vienna 10 March - 11 April 1980, A/CONF. 97/19]
- reasonableness [43(1)]: In addition to being specifically mentioned in this article, reasonableness is a general principle of the CISG
Pace Law School Institute of
International Commercial Law
- Last updated December 22, 2000
Comments/Contributions
Go to Database Directory ||
Go to Table of Contents to Annotated Text of CISG