| Austria | 1 | Hungary | 1 | Russia | 4 |
| Belgium | 1 | Mexico | 1 | United States | 2 |
| China | 3 | Netherlands | 2 | Total | 15 |
Presented below is a composite list of Art. 96 cases reporting UNCITRAL Digest cases and other Art. 96 cases. All cases are listed in chronological sequence, commencing with the most recent. Asterisks identify the cases cited in the 2008 UNCITRAL Digest, commencing with the 21 July 2010 citation reported below. Cases are coded to the UNCITRAL Thesaurus.
English texts and full-text English translations of cases are provided as indicated. In most instances researchers can also access UNCITRAL abstracts and link to Unilex abstracts and full-text original-language case texts sourced from Internet websites and other data on the cases.
* United States 21 July 2010 Federal Appellate Court [3rd Circuit] (Forestal Guarani, S.A. v. Daros International, Inc.)
Netherlands 17 February 2009 Gerechtshof [Appellate Court] 's-Gravenhage (U.S. party v. Restauratiebedrijf B.V.)
United States 7 October 2008 Federal District Court [New Jersey] (Forestal Guarani, S.A. v. Daros International, Inc.)
* United States 19 May 2008 Federal District Court [Florida] (Zhejiang Shaoxing Yongli Pringing and Dyeing Co., Ltd v. Microflock Textile Group Corporation)
United States 7 February 2006 Federal District Court [Texas] (China North Chemical Industries Corporation v. Beston Chemical Corporation)
Chile 10 August 2005 Supreme Court (Agricultural Machinery case)
* Russia 9 June 2004 Arbitration proceeding 125/2003 [translation available]
* Russia 16 February 2004 Arbitration proceeding 107/2002 [translation available]
* Austria 17 December 2003 Supreme Court (Tantalum powder case) [translation available]
Russia 20 March 2002 High Arbitration Court (or Presidium of Supreme Arbitration Court) of the Russian Federation [translation available]
Austria 22 October 2001 Supreme Court [1 Ob 77/01g] (Gasoline and gas oil case) [translation available]
* Netherlands 12 July 2001 District Court Rotterdam (Hispafruit BV v. Amuyen S.A.) [translation available]
Lithuania 27 March 2000 Appellate Court
* China 29 March 1999 CIETAC Arbitration proceeding (Flanges case) [translation available]
Russia 10 June 1999 Arbitration proceeding 55/1998 [translation available]
* Russia 16 February 1998 High Arbitration Court: Information Letter 29
* China 31 December 1997 CIETAC Arbitration proceeding (Lindane case) [translation available]
* Netherlands 7 November 1997 Supreme Court Hoge Raad (J.T. Schuermans v. Boomsma Distilleerderij/Wijnkoperij)
Hungary 17 June 1997 Metropolitan Court (Vago v. Monimpex)
* Russia 25 March 1997 High Arbitration Court (or Presidium of Supreme Arbitration Court) of the Russian Federation, Ruling No. 6, Resolution No. 4670/96 [translation available]
Russia 1997 High Arbitration Court [Ruling No. 4, case 2]
China 17 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration proceeding (Tinplate case) [translation available]
* China 16 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration proceeding (Engines case) [translation available]
Netherlands 5 June 1996 Appellate Court Leeuwarden (Schuermans v. Boomsa)
* Mexico 29 April 1996 Compromex Arbitration proceeding (Conservas La Costella S.A. de C.V. v. Lanín) [translation available]
Russia 1 December 1995 Arbitration proceeding 22/1995 [translation available]
* Belgium 2 May 1995 District Court Hasselt (Vital Berry Marketing v. Dira-Frost)
Netherlands 11 August 1994 District Court Leeuwarden (Schuermans v. Boomsma)
United States 15 June 1993 Federal Appellate Court [5th Circuit] (Beijing Metals v. American Business Center)
* Hungary 24 March 1992 Metropolitan Court (Adamfi Video v. Alkotók Studiósa Kisszövetkezet)
Pace Law School
Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated July 31, 2012