Cases on the CISG by courts and arbitral tribunals
of the People's Republic of China [*]

Table of Contents

---

Article 1	Article 2	Article 3	Article 4	Article 5	Article 6	Article 7	Article 8	Article 9	Article 10
Article 11	Article 12	Article 13	Article 14	Article 15	Article 16	Article 17	Article 18	Article 19	Article 20
Article 21	Article 22	Article 23	Article 24	Article 25	Article 26	Article 27	Article 28	Article 29	Article 30
Article 31	Article 32	Article 33	Article 34	Article 35	Article 36	Article 37	Article 38	Article 39	Article 40
Article 41	Article 42	Article 43	Article 44	Article 45	Article 46	Article 47	Article 48	Article 49	Article 50
Article 51	Article 52	Article 53	Article 54	Article 55	Article 56	Article 57	Article 58	Article 59	Article 60
Article 61	Article 62	Article 63	Article 64	Article 65	Article 66	Article 67	Article 68	Article 69	Article 70
Article 71	Article 72	Article 73	Article 74	Article 75	Article 76	Article 77	Article 78	Article 79	Article 80
Article 81	Article 82	Article 83	Article 84	Article 85	Article 86	Article 87	Article 88	Article 89	Article 90
Article 91	Article 92	Article 93	Article 94	Article 95	Article 96	Article 97	Article 98	Article 99	Article 100
Article 101

* A global jurisconsultorium is the proper setting for analysis of uniform law jurisprudence. The volume of uniform law case law from China is large in comparison to the volume of uniform law case law from other countries. China is thus one of the most prominent contributors to world understanding of uniform law. To view the case law of China in the context of China's contribution to the global jurisconsultorium, go to 2,500 cases 10,000 case annotations. This will enable you to set PRC cases on this provision of the CISG alongside cases from courts and arbitral tribunals of sister signatories and other jurisdictions - helpful precedents all. 2,500 cases 10,000 case annotations also accompanies this jurisprudence with a global UNCITRAL digest of cases on this provision of the CISG and contains other relevant case annotations.

©Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated February 22, 2010