Cases and case translations added to database in November 2012
[new material identified in red]
GERMANY 26 September 2012 Supreme Court (Clay case). Arts. 3, 7, 35, 38, 39, 40, 45, 74, 77, 79, 80
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
AUSTRIA 28 June 2012 Supreme Court (Seat belt case). Art. 38
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
UNITED KINGDOM 1 May 2012 The High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division [Commercial Court] (Kingspan Environmental Limited, Tyrrell Tanks Ltd, Rom Plastics Limitd, and Titan Enviornmental Ltd v. Borealis A/S and Borealis UK Ltd). Arts. 8, 35, 36, 39, 40
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
AUSTRALIA 23 March 2012 Federal Court of Australia (Traxys Europe SA v. Balaji Coke Industry Pvt Ltd and Booyan Coad Pvt Ltd ). Art. [-]
NETHERLANDS 8 July 2011 Supreme Court (Ontwikkelingsmaatschappij G4 Management BV, Ntwikkelingsmaatschappij G4 CV v. Hanzevast Investments BV, Hanzevast Investments III BV). Arts. 45, 49, 61, 64
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
NETHERLANDS 15 June 2011 District Court Arnhem (Wohngesund International EU v. T&G Wood International BV). Arts. 35, 36, 74
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
NETHERLANDS 13 December 2010 District Court 's-Hertogenbosch. Arts. [-]
NETHERLANDS 29 September 2010 District Court Rotterdam (Frihol Mushroom Vertriebsgesellschaft mbh v. Greenery BV). Arts. 1, 7, 8, 14, 18, 19
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
NETHERLANDS 11 September 2010 Gerechtshof [Appellate Court] Leeuwarden ([-] v. IP Industrial Products Gmbh). Arts. 25, 49, 51
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
NETHERLANDS 27 July 2010 District Court Rotterdam (GP Shipping VOF v. Defendant). Arts. 2, 5
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
NETHERLANDS 21 July 2010 District Court 's-Hertogenbosch (GEMCO Mobile Systems BV v. Communications Magnet Motor Gmbh). Art. 31
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
NETHERLANDS 30 June 2010 District Court Rotterdam (English Nut Group BV v. AGRA Trading). Art. [-]
GERMANY 18 May 2010 Supreme Court (Dishwasher case). Art. 45
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
GERMANY 18 May 2010 Supreme Court (Floor tiles case). Art. 45
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
NETHERLANDS 7 January 2010 District Court 's-Hertogenbosch (Light 11 Gmbh v. Defendant). Art. [-]
BRAZIL 19 August 2009 Superior Court of Justice (Atecs vs. Rodrimar). Art. 1(1)(b)
NETHERLANDS 6 May 2009 District Court Rotterdam (Petron Emirates Contracting & Manufacturing Co. LLC v. NEM BV). Art. [-]
NETHERLANDS 25 March 2009 District Court Arnhem (English Mushroom Equipment BV v. Azienda Agricola Funghi D'Abruzzo). Art. [-]
NETHERLANDS 8 July 2008 Gerechtshof [Appellate Court] (Wümeg Verbund Gruppe Farbe und Heimtex eG v. BV Telenzo Carpet Factory). Art. [-]
NETHERLANDS 20 May 2008 Gerechtshof [Appellate Court] (Plaintiff v. CAB Truck Trading BV). Art. [-]
GERMANY 15 November 2007 Supreme Court (Stove case). Art. 46
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
ITALY 30 July 2007 Milan Arbitration proceeding (Machinery case). Arts. 25, 38, 39, 40, 49, 50
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
FRANCE 25 November 2003 Supreme Court (Boots case) [Rejection of Appeal]. Art. 30
- Key issues identified in this newly reported case
BRAZIL 1 March 2001 Superior Court of Justice (Excel Credito Financiamento e Investimento SA v. Ailton de Souza Rocha). Art. [-]
Texts of commentaries to be added to database in November 2012
KOFOD, Rolf
2011.Hardship in International Sales, CISG and the UNIDROIT Principles, Thesis, University of Copenhagen-Faculty of Law (December 2011)
MARTIN, Jennifer S.
2012. Does Article 2 Inform CISG Damages? Social Science Research Network (October 2012) available on the Internet at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2160344>
SCHROETER, Ulrich G.
2012. The Cross-Border Freedom of Form Principle Under Reservation: The Role of Articles 12 and 96 CISG in Theory and Practice, (October 31, 2012). Available online at SSRN: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2169834> or <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2169834>
Citations to be added to database bibliography
ALAOUDH, Abdullah S.
2012. The Notice Requirement of Article 39 and Islamic Law: Developed vs. Developing Countries, Arab law quarterly (London) vol. 26, no. 3 (2012) 481-498
HUANG, Yanming
2012. Two Notes on the Application of the CISG to Cases Under the Jurisdiction of the CIETAC South China, 27 Mealey’s International Arbitration Report, no. 9 (2012) 19-29
JOHNSON, William P.
2012. The Hierarchy That Wasn’t There; Elevating ‘Usage’ to its Rightful Position for Contracts Governed by the CISG, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business (Chicago) vol. 32, no. 2 (2012) 263-303
MAGNUS, Ulrich., ed. [Germany]
2012. CISG vs. regional sales law unification: with a focus on the new Common European Sales Law, Sellier European Law Publishers (2012) 237 p. [contributions by: U. Magnus -- The U.S. experience with the UCC and the CISG: some insights for the proposed CESL? / H. M. Flechtner -- The curious case of transborder sales law: a comparative analysis of CESL, CISG, and the UCC / L. A. DiMatteo -- The CISG and the common law: the Australian experience / B. Zeller -- CISG and OHADA Sales Law / F. Ferrari -- CISG vs. CESL / U. Magnus -- CISG, CESL, PICC and PECL / R. Koch -- Concluding remarks / U. Magnus -- Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law]
OSAKA BAR ASSOCIATION
2012. [Practical guide to the CISG (1980): through a comparison with Japanese civil and commercial law (part 16) - in Japanese] 40 International Practice Study Group, Kokusai shoji homu (Tokyo) vol. 10 (2012) 1570-1571
SABA, Nadia [Australia]
2012. To Believe or Not to Believe: Good Faith in the CISG, Macquarie Journal of Business Law (Sydney, Australia) vol. 9 (2012) 81-87
