6B [Choice of law of Contracting State without exclusion of CISG = choice of CISG];

18C [Acceptance of offer: assent by performing an act];

19A ["Acceptance of offer with modifications]

35B [Conformity of goods to contract (requirements implied by law): the court states: "[T]he parties cite almost exclusively to Minnesota law ... The parties have not briefed whether application of the CISG to TEC's contract claims would differ from application of the Minnesota UCC. However 'case-law interpreting analogous provisions of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code ... may also inform a court where the language of the relevant CISG provision tracks that of the UCC." Delchi Carrier S.p.A. v. Rotorex Corp, ... Therefore, unless noted otherwise, Saint-Gobain's Motion [which the court granted] is analyzed under the Minnesota UCC, as briefed by the parties."