Germany 22 December 1992 District Court Darmstadt (New Zealand mussels case)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/921222g1.html]
Primary source(s) for case presentation: CISG online case overview
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: 140 O 165/92
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: 2nd instance OLG Frankfurt 20 April 1994 [affirming]; 3rd instance BGH (Supreme Court) 8 March 1995 [affirming]
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Switzerland (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: Germany (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: New Zealand mussels
APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes [Article 1(1)(a)]
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue: Articles
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code
numbers:
Descriptors:
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (German): cisg-online.ch <http://www.cisg-online.ch/cisg/urteile/177.htm>
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
English: Koch, Pace Review of Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods (1998) 241-242 n.219 [fundamental breach: frustration of purpose of contract]
Case abstracts
See OLG Frankfurt 20 April 1994 and BGH 8 March 1995 for abstracts of appellate proceedings
Classification of issues present
Editorial remarks
Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
Pace Law School Institute of International
Commercial Law - Last updated July 30, 2003
Comments/Contributions
Go to Database Directory || Go to CISG Table of Contents
|| Go to Case Search Form || Go to Bibliography